CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

The U.S. government has issued a proposal that is out for public comment. If finalized, it would “amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement a requirement to ensure certain Federal contractors disclose their greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related financial risk and set science-based targets to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.”

The proposal acknowledged similarities exist between the proposed SEC climate disclosure rule and this current proposal, but:

“… this proposed FAR rule specifically requires the Federal contractors with significant Federal contracts to provide their disclosures using the CDP Climate Change Questionnaire to maximize the consistency, comparability, and accessibility of disclosure data for use in managing Federal procurements and supply chains. In addition, per this proposed FAR rule, major contractors will also be required to set science-based targets to reduce their GHG emissions.”

The rule would explicitly codify into U.S. regulations the CDP framework as it is aligned with TCFD, the GHG Protocol and the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTI). It would also have a broad impact – “cover[ing] 86 percent of annual spend and about 86 percent of supply chain GHG impacts.” Scope 3 reporting would also be required.

In explaining the types of entities potentially impacted:

“This rule proposes to separate ‘major Federal suppliers’ into two categories: significant contractors and major contractors. Per this proposed rule, both significant contractors and major contractors would be subject to annual Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions disclosure requirements …, while only major contractors would be subject to the annual climate disclosure, which includes disclosure of Scope 3 GHG emissions, and science-based target requirements …”

  • A “significant contractor” is one that “received $7.5 million or more, but not exceeding $50 million, in Federal contract obligations (as defined in OMB Circular A-11) in the prior Federal fiscal year as indicated in the System for Award Management (SAM) at https://www.sam.gov.” 
  • A “major contractor” is one that “received more than $50 million in Federal contract obligations (as defined in OMB Circular A-11) in the prior Federal fiscal year as indicated in SAM.”

“According to award data available in the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), there were approximately 4,413 entities that received between $7.5 million and $50 million in Federal contract obligations in FY 2021, of which 2,835 (64 percent) are estimated to be small businesses. There were approximately 1,353 entities that received more than $50 million in Federal contract obligations in FY 2021, of which 389 (29 percent) are estimated to be small businesses.”

This proposal was issued under Executive Order (E.O.) 14030 of 2021.

Comments are due on or before January 13, 2023.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Lawrence Heim has been practicing in the field of ESG management for almost 40 years. He began his career as a legal assistant in the Environmental Practice of Vinson & Elkins working for a partner who is nationally recognized and an adjunct professor of environmental law at the University of Texas Law School. He moved into technical environmental consulting with ENSR Consulting & Engineering at the height of environmental regulatory development, working across a range of disciplines. He was one… View Profile