CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites


A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.


An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.


The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.


Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

When the Critical Audit Matter (CAM) standard was released by the PCAOB, I felt that could be a viable path for auditors to bring more visibility to financially material ESG matters. My idea didn’t seem to be getting much traction as I wrote last year. Back in 2021, Advisory Board member Dan Goelzer provided an excellent overview of then-new studies from the Center for Audit Quality (CAQ) on the increasing importance – and risks – of third party assurance for ESG disclosures. Again, I thought that gave solid footing for the use of CAMs in reporting of ESG issues in 10-Ks/Qs (although in dialogs with Dan, he cautioned me that CAMs are limited in scope to financial statement matters within traditional financial audits and he was less confident in their applicability to ESG).

Over on, Meredith wrote today about an interesting development related to CAMs. It isn’t just ESG matters that aren’t rising to CAM standards – apparently, very little actually is:

During a meeting of the PCAOB’s Standards and Emerging Issues Advisory Group on March 30, 2023, Jeffrey Mahoney, general counsel of the Council of Institutional Investors (CII), expressed concern that subsets of Auditing Standard (AS) 3101 aren’t being addressed in CAM disclosures—specifically, an indication of the outcome of the audit procedures with respect to the CAM and the auditor’s related key observations. Reuters also reports that the number of CAMs per audit has decreased over the years. With CAMs in the spotlight, perhaps that trend will reverse.

She also wrote separately about how auditors are being pulled into the SVB failure lawsuit – which may or may not have an interconnection to a lack of CAMs.

Perhaps naively, I still hold out hope that auditors will take advantage of the CAM standard to increase visibility of ESG risks to their clients – especially as ESG becomes more financially material to investors.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Lawrence Heim has been practicing in the field of ESG management for almost 40 years. He began his career as a legal assistant in the Environmental Practice of Vinson & Elkins working for a partner who is nationally recognized and an adjunct professor of environmental law at the University of Texas Law School. He moved into technical environmental consulting with ENSR Consulting & Engineering at the height of environmental regulatory development, working across a range of disciplines. He was one… View Profile