CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Carbon Direct and Microsoft have published 2023 revisions to their report: Criteria for High-Quality Carbon Dioxide Removal. In the report, the authors lament the lack of a comparable standard for CO2 removal projects and attempt to proffer their own criteria for assessment in the hopes of advancing a common definition of high-quality CO2 removal.

The report lays out several essential principles for high-quality carbon dioxide removal and then discusses how to apply those principles to eight methods of carbon dioxide removal. The authors analyze how different CO2 removal methods should be assessed based on their harms and benefits, impacts on environmental justice, additionality, verifiability, durability, risk of leakage, and other project-specific considerations. CO2 removal methods are broken down into three categories, nature-based, engineered, and hybrid. The report concludes with a call for collaboration stating that:

It is through increased investment, collaboration, and community engagement that we can collectively build a strong foundation for the future of carbon removal.

Presently, CO2 removal is in its infancy and no single method has presented itself as the gold standard for scalability. As a result, carbon capture and storage projects lack strong data controls and validation. This makes the efficacy of many carbon credits questionable. Companies that rely heavily on offsetting for their net-zero strategies are now facing scrutiny as the validity of those offsets are called into question.  Hopefully, initiatives like Carbon Direct and Microsoft’s partnership will lead to a standardized and comparable carbon market which will give rise to more reliable carbon credits.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile