CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites


A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.


An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.


The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.


Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) extends an extra-jurisdictional requirement for certain companies that operate – but are not headquartered – in the EU. These companies, referred to as third-country companies, must file reports at the consolidated entity level beginning in 2028. One group of companies in scope are those with securities listed on EU exchanges, known as third-country issuers.

CSRD references the EU’s Taxonomy Directive, which establishes criteria that economic activities and investments must meet to be considered “environmentally sustainable.” This has many wondering if the interplay between the CSRD and the Taxonomy Directive will create a requirement for third-country issuers to also comply with the Taxonomy Directive. A recent Shearman & Sterling memo discusses this possibility and makes the case that the Taxonomy Directive will not apply to third-country issuers.  The memo states:

“In our view, it would be an incorrect application of purposive interpretative principles to invoke these so as to assert a broad extraterritorial jurisdiction of onerous new legislation to third country entities, in the absence of a clear express provision to this effect. Moreover, it is difficult in our view to draw a purposive interpretation of this nature given the lack of clear evidence of intention in the preparatory papers and, at present, inconsistent guidance (in particular in the Taxonomy User Guide).”

This analysis could be subject to change if new guidance is issued on the point, but for now, it appears that the Taxonomy Directive will not apply to third-country issuers – including US companies. The EU’s Green Deal has presented a challenge as companies worldwide struggle to keep up with the fast pace of new legislation. The full implications of extra-judicial provisions of EU law, like the one in the CSRD, are not yet fully known.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile