CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites


A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.


An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.


The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.


Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Last week at the conference, I moderated a panel on the rising anti-ESG movement. One major theme discussed was the role of anti-ESG in investing. Many anti-ESG advocacy groups are bringing lawsuits against financial service providers alleging breach of fiduciary duty. These suits argue that consideration of ESG factors in investments comes at the expense of financial returns. Recently, a federal court in the Northern District of Texas punched a hole in this theory. The case arose as a challenge to the Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) ESG investing rule brought by 25 Republican Attorneys General.

A Ropes & Gray memo discusses the court’s ruling stating:

“The judge held that the rule, which allows consideration of ESG-related factors in selecting plan investment options in some circumstances, is not inconsistent with ERISA’s requirement that fiduciaries act for the ‘exclusive purpose’ of providing ‘financial benefits’ to participants. In response to the states’ assertion that ‘the plain text of ERISA forecloses consideration of non-pecuniary factors,’ the judge pointed to consistent DOL statements over many years that ESG considerations do relate to financial returns.”

The loss at the district level is a setback, but the case will almost certainly be appealed to the Fifth Circuit. If the appeals court sides with the DOL, that could be devastating for the anti-ESG movement’s investment litigation. Should the precedent be set that ESG considerations do relate to financial returns, that is probably one of the final nails in the anti-ESG coffin. Especially if that decision comes from one of the country’s most conservative circuits.

If you aren’t already, subscribe to our complimentary ESG blog here: for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile