CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites


A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.


An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.


The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.


Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

To accomplish their climate goals, many countries are betting on ambient carbon dioxide removal (CDR) more than emissions reductions. Reliance on developing technologies that have not been brought to scale is almost certain to face further scrutiny in the courtroom. As discussed by the European Journal of International Law in a recent blog post:

“There are a host of concerns about large-scale reliance on CDR. At their core is the view that governments and companies appear to be relying on a scale of removal (and storage) that is far beyond the physical limits of any currently available techniques – creating a high risk of future non-deployment, as well as significant implications for human rights and ecological integrity.”

If CDR is off the table for governments, then companies that are relying on it will also likely have to find alternative avenues to net-zero. Companies like Occidental (which is investing in carbon removal infrastructure in Texas) would face direct consequences if courts ruled that their government clients could not rely as heavily on their services. Without government funding (like the US government grant obtained by Occidental), it is unlikely that carbon removal technologies can be brought to scale. That would also impact corporate CDR clientele like Amazon who announced a 10-year carbon removal credit purchase agreement with Occidental.

The impacts would also extend to other high emitting sectors. If a court rules that a government cannot rely on carbon removals, the focus would then be on emissions reduction. This would result in further regulation and scrutiny of heavy emitting sectors which would ripple out to the wider economy. For example, if a country were ordered to scale back on fossil fuels subsidies or commercial aviation, this would create considerable impacts for the economy at large. The outcome of litigation may either supercharge CDR technology development or be its death knell.

If you aren’t already signed up, subscribe to our complimentary ESG blog here: for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile