CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites


A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.


An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.


The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.


Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Back in August, the House Committee on the Judiciary sent a request for documents to shareholder activist group As You Sow alleging that the group “appears to facilitate collusion that may violate U.S. antitrust law”. As You Sow ultimately declined to produce the requested documents and instead questioned the Committee’s authority in requesting them. This led the Committee to fire another volley on November 1st in the form of a subpoena. The letter accompanying the subpoena stated:

“As You Sow’s response without compulsory process has been inadequate. To date, three months after the Committee’s initial requests, As You Sow has not produced a single document in response to the Committee’s requests. Further, As You Sow has made clear that it does not intend to comply voluntarily with the Committee’s requests.”

Moving to a compulsory discovery process is one step closer to litigation, but it is important to put this into a greater context. Notably, the Committee cannot bring about any litigation itself, the subpoena is only for the purposes of evaluating the current regulatory landscape. However, any findings from the subpoena could potentially be handed off to another party, like a state Attorney General, to bring litigation.

As Carsten Reichel discussed in our panel on Anti-ESG at the Conference in September, an investigation – even a subpoena – is a long way from a concrete enforcement action. Even with that in mind, it is difficult not to be a little nervous when a government entity makes their request compulsory.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here: for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile