CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

California’s new AB 1305 – the Voluntary Carbon Market Disclosures Act may not have captured as much attention as the state’s other new climate disclosure requirements, but it is still broadly applicable. Although the first part of the legislative language concerns only businesses that are “marketing or selling voluntary carbon offsets within the state”, the rest of the law covers many more companies – and becomes effective in less than two months (January 1, 2024).

The law is very short – the text that applies to users of offsets is below:

An entity that purchases or uses voluntary carbon offsets that makes claims regarding the achievement of net zero emissions, claims that the entity, related entity, or a product is “carbon neutral,” or makes other claims implying the entity, related entity, or a product does not add net carbon dioxide or greenhouse gases to the climate or has made significant reductions to its carbon dioxide or greenhouse gas emissions shall disclose on the entity’s internet website all of the following information pertaining to each project or program:

(a) The name of the business entity selling the offset and the offset registry or program.

(b) The project identification number, if applicable.

(c) The project name as listed in the registry or program, if applicable.

(d) The offset project type, including whether the offsets purchased were derived from a carbon removal, an avoided emission, or a combination of both, and site location.

(e) The specific protocol used to estimate emissions reductions or removal benefits.

(f) Whether there is independent third-party verification of company data and claims listed.

(g) This section does not apply to entities that do not operate within the state or do not purchase or use voluntary carbon offsets sold within the state.

The law continues with regard to claims of Net-zero and carbon neutrality made by any company:

An entity that makes claims regarding the achievement of net zero emissions, claims that the entity, a related or affiliated entity, or a product is “carbon neutral,” or makes other claims implying the entity, related or affiliated entity, or a product does not add net carbon dioxide or greenhouse gases … to the climate or has made significant reductions to its carbon dioxide or greenhouse gas emissions … shall disclose on the entity’s internet website all of the following information pertaining to all greenhouse gas emissions associated with its claims:

(a) All information documenting how, if at all, a “carbon neutral,” “net zero emission,” or other similar claim was determined to be accurate or actually accomplished, and how interim progress toward that goal is being measured. This information may include, but not be limited to, disclosure of independent third-party verification of all of the entity’s greenhouse gas emissions, identification of the entity’s science-based targets for its emissions reduction pathway, and disclosure of the relevant sector methodology and third-party verification used for the entity’s science-based targets and emissions reduction pathway.

(b) Whether there is independent third-party verification of the company data and claims listed.

(c) This section does not apply to entities that either do not operate within the state, or that do not make claims within the state.

As in the other new California climate laws, there is ambiguity with the phrase “operate within the state” which could be interpreted very broadly – capturing a wider range of companies than might be initially thought. There is also the question of how “significant reductions” will be defined – the latest question posed and answered in our Q&A Forum.

Is your company’s offset due diligence process robust enough to ensure you know if any purchased offsets originate from California, triggering reporting? It won’t be too difficult for media, AI bots and NGOs to make these determinations – creating regulatory risk for companies that don’t investigate and report.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here: https://practicalesg.com/subscribe/ for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Lawrence Heim has been practicing in the field of ESG management for almost 40 years. He began his career as a legal assistant in the Environmental Practice of Vinson & Elkins working for a partner who is nationally recognized and an adjunct professor of environmental law at the University of Texas Law School. He moved into technical environmental consulting with ENSR Consulting & Engineering at the height of environmental regulatory development, working across a range of disciplines. He was one… View Profile