CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites


A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.


An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.


The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.


Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

[Ed. note: In observance of Thanksgiving in the US, no blogs will be published from tomorrow through Friday. We will be back next Monday. Happy Thanksgiving to everyone!]

The UK’s Financial Reporting Council (FRC) recently published an article on materiality. Materiality is a useful tool for assessing issues that are most important to companies. FRC also urges companies to view materiality from the lens of the investor and to apply materiality concepts holistically rather than in silos. The article states that:

“Companies and their advisers told us materiality is typically considered through three separate lenses:

Quantitative financial thresholds – typically assessed as a set threshold for correcting errors and including disclosures about significant transactions;

Qualitative financial aspects – generally an informal understanding of ‘what’s important’ to the company that frames narrative reporting; and

Sustainability-related information – a focused review on sustainability-related issues, typically collecting multiple stakeholder viewpoints and mapping these on a matrix.

While each of these lenses overlap and interrelate, most companies looked at them separately. This differs from how investors evaluate information for decision-making. Investors want to understand the business model and strategy in a holistic and connected way.”

The FRC is encouraging companies to bring these aspects together and report in a way that tells the whole story. This point is something that is often lost in the Financial vs. Double Materiality debate. For companies to adequately address sustainability risk, they need to understand how sustainability impacts their financial position. Some argue this cannot be understood if sustainability and finance are evaluated in vacuums.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here: for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile