CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites


A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.


An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.


The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.


Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

A group of NGOs filed a complaint with the French National Prosecutor’s Office, alleging that BNP Paribas, Credit Agricole, BPCE, and Axa all contribute to and profit from illegal deforestation in the Amazon. This differs from a “Complaint” in the American legal sense, but a press release from the NGOs describes the legal theory:

“The Financial Action Task Force, the global money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog, has identified environmental crime as one of the most profitable criminal enterprises globally. In Brazil most of the deforestation is illegal and is often connected to other violations of criminal law such as corruption, money laundering and fraud.

BNP Paribas, Crédit Agricole, BPCE and Axa, by holding bonds issued by companies profiting from environmental crimes, are helping to reintroduce the proceeds of these offences into the legal circuit, when bonds are repaid with proceeds derived from illegal deforestation.”

The complaint calls on the French National Prosecutor’s Office to investigate the alleged crimes and bring charges if sufficient evidence is found. It is unclear whether formal charges will be brought. This is a great example of the hidden legal risks of ESG. The role of the financial institutions doesn’t come in the form of directly funding deforestation projects, but rather by holding bonds issued by companies that allegedly drive illegal deforestation. Potential ESG liability can lie in company supply chains, or in enabling behaviors like financing or advising. This complaint is a reminder that legal and reputational exposure isn’t always limited to direct operations – it can arise through a company’s broader web of activities.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here: for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile