CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites


A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.


An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.


The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.


Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Ørsted, the Danish energy company, was once a Wall Street darling. Today, however, the company faces a different future. According to Financial Times, Ørsted:

“suspended its dividend and slashed targets for developing renewables as the world’s largest offshore wind developer plots a recovery following a calamitous 12 months. The Copenhagen-listed company said on Wednesday it would also cut up to 800 jobs and withdraw from offshore wind markets in Norway, Spain and Portugal, marking a retreat after several years of aggressive expansion. Chief executive Mads Nipper said the moves were necessary to turn Ørsted into a ‘leaner and more efficient company’ after a surge in interest rates and challenges in the US left it with multibillion-dollar impairments.

… Ørsted’s share price has fallen more than 70 per cent since peaking in 2021 at the height of investor frenzy over environmentally friendly stocks.”

Yet this contrasts oddly with its latest financial results released yesterday. Mads Nipper, Group President and CEO of Ørsted, said in a statement:

“We delivered strong operational results in 2023 with an adjusted EBITDA slightly above our guidance and with several important milestones achieved. Earnings from our offshore sites more than doubled compared to last year, and in 2023, we advanced three large offshore wind projects with a total capacity of 4.5 GW to final investment decision, one in the UK, the US, and Taiwan, respectively…”

This paradox is emblematic of companies getting out over their skis on climate/sustainability matters – making commitments about which they may not be fully informed, or are too dogmatic. On the other hand, maybe they took a business risk that didn’t pan out. The FT article explained that Ørsted, in their zeal, became “particularly exposed in part because of its aggressive, early expansion into the still embryonic US [wind] market, where it has struggled to get tax credits and complained of onerous requirements for parts to be made locally.”

Ørsted is not alone in being perhaps too aggressive on climate matters, but they are one of the more dramatic examples. Companies face a difficult choice at the moment: take a risk on first-mover advantage in the climate business/risk management or wait until regulatory frameworks and market solutions settle. Different stakeholders are pushing for different directions.

Which is your company, and how thorough was the process in making the decision/assessing risks? Does the current environment require you to reassess/reconsider?

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here: for daily updates delivered right to you.

Disclaimer: I do not own any shares of Ørsted.

Photo credit: piter2121 –

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Lawrence Heim has been practicing in the field of ESG management for almost 40 years. He began his career as a legal assistant in the Environmental Practice of Vinson & Elkins working for a partner who is nationally recognized and an adjunct professor of environmental law at the University of Texas Law School. He moved into technical environmental consulting with ENSR Consulting & Engineering at the height of environmental regulatory development, working across a range of disciplines. He was one… View Profile