CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

BlackRock is back in Anti-ESG’s crosshairs. The Indiana Secretary of State issued a cease and desist letter last week to the firm alleging securities fraud. The Indiana letter is similar to one sent by the Mississippi Secretary of State back in March and alleges that BlackRock has misled investors about the benefits of considering ESG factors in investment decisions. The Indiana Capital Chronicle summarizes the allegations stating:

“The Indiana Securities Division alleges BlackRock, ‘through its assertions relating to ESG products and offerings, has repeatedly made false and misleading statements to Hoosier investors,’ Morales said. The company is accused by Morales of telling clients their financial prospects and outcomes would be better in the long run through ESG-backed funds. The secretary of state emphasized in his letter that there is ‘little to no evidence’ to back that up, although Morales offers no evidence of his own to substantiate the allegations.”

BlackRock argues that the letter is politically motivated and misrepresents the firm’s approach to ESG. BlackRock isn’t the ESG champion that Mississippi and Indiana make it out to be and BlackRock’s support for ESG proposals in the 2024 proxy season remained low. It’s unclear whether the Mississippi and Indiana letters will eventually evolve into full-blown litigation. If the states do bring lawsuits they join a growing body of cases asking courts to evaluate the role of ESG in investing. So far these cases have seen mixed results, with some being thrown out while others are ongoing. So far, no courts have found ESG investing to be unlawful, but that hasn’t stopped – and isn’t likely to stop – more cases from being brought.

Our members can find more information on the anti-ESG movement here.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here for daily updates delivered right to you.

Photo Credit: Tada Images – stock.adobe.com

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile