CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Courts across the world are seeing more climate cases at all levels across a variety of litigation. Greenwashing cases have been brought against major corporations, a variety of tort litigation has been brought against carbon majors, and municipalities and governments have faced litigation based on climate policy. While cases play out nationally, there has also been an influx of international cases on the world stage. One of these was the recent decision from the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea which ruled that signatories had a duty to reduce emissions and protect ecosystems. Another international body, the UN’s International Court of Justice (ICJ), is also set to hear a major climate case A recent article in Nature examines the case stating:

“This is where the entry of the world’s highest court could be a game changer. In the next few months, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations’ principal judicial organ in The Hague, the Netherlands, will begin hearing  evidence on two broad questions: first, what are countries’ obligations in international law to protect the climate system from anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions, and second, what should the legal consequences be for states when their actions — or failure to act — cause harm?”

While the ICJ does not have the authority to create binding precedent, its decision may help spur climate action globally, especially in jurisdictions outside the US. The ICJ has the potential to set an international standard for what we expect from countries regarding efforts to prevent and mitigate climate change. These standards are likely to have a “trickle-down” effect on companies. As jurisdictions change their laws and requirements to meet international standards, companies may find their operations hampered by new regulations. Those developing and implementing climate plans will have an easier time transitioning to new regulatory schemes than those taking a “wait and see” approach.

Our members can read more about climate litigation here.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile