CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Since their introduction California bills SB 253 and SB 261 have taken the sustainability world by storm. Many expected the SEC climate disclosure rules to be the regulation that ushered in mandatory reporting of GHG emissions, but with the SEC rule facing legal headwinds, California has taken the spotlight. At the end of this year’s legislative session, the California state legislature passed SB 219 which amends SB 252 and SB 261 in key ways, including:

  • Extended rulemaking deadline from January 1, 2025, to July 1, 2025
  • Require CARB to prepare a schedule for Scope 3 disclosures separate from the existing timeline
  • Allow a covered entity to consolidate emissions disclosure reports at the parent company level
  • Eliminate filing fee requirements
  • Authorize, not require, CARB to contract with a climate reporting organization when developing the public disclosure database.

The bill now goes to Governor Newsom’s desk where he has until September 30, to sign or veto the amendments. It is important to note that the amendments in SB 219 are not the same as those proposed by Newsom we previously wrote about. The bill containing those amendments never made it out of the legislature and the SB 219 amendments are fundamentally different. Importantly, SB 219 declined to extend reporting deadlines to the extent that Newsom’s amendments would have. Companies are taking steps to prepare for the first reporting deadline in January 1, 2026. However, with rulemaking now extended to July 1, 2025 companies won’t have clear reporting guidelines until six months before the first reports are due.

Our members can learn more about California’s new laws here.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile