CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

A new greenwashing case has been brought by the Environmental Working Group in the District of Columbia against agricultural giant Tyson Foods. The case alleges that, despite the company’s claims of being “net-zero by 2050” and producing “climate-smart” beef, Tyson has no tangible plan to reach net-zero or reduce its emissions. The lawsuit argues that Tyson’s net-zero messaging is at odds with the company’s plans to scale up production to meet future demand, stating that:

“Reducing emissions on the enormous scale of Tyson’s supply chain cannot be done with current technology without dramatically reducing herd sizes, which Tyson is neither planning nor willing to do. Tyson thus has no serious intention of doing the things that could actually reduce its emissions—let alone achieve net zero. And Tyson fails to qualify its net-zero emissions statements, omitting the fact that it is simply impossible with current technology and available offsets to sufficiently eliminate the enormous scope of its emissions. This renders Tyson’s net-zero claims false or misleading, and unlawful under the CPPA.”

This case is somewhat similar to ongoing global litigation against major airlines, another hard-to-abate industry that is struggling to use sustainability claims to alter its public perception. While Tyson does have near-term targets set under the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) the company does not have a long-term or net-zero target approved under the framework. The Plaintiffs argue that given the current state of technology and agricultural practices, there is no possible way for Tyson to meaningfully reduce its emissions in line with its marketing and claims. This is another case that reminds us that it is important to keep sustainability marketing within the scope of what a company is doing or has done, rather than what a company hopes to do. We are past the point where climate commitments are sufficient – regulators, NGOs, and customers are now checking to see if companies if have concrete plans to back their claims – and whether those plans are consistent with overall business plans.

Our members can learn more about greenwashing here.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile