CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

This is big news in the realm of corporate liability for supply chain human rights risk. Cisco Systems is being sued in California for aiding and abetting human rights violations by the Chinese government. According to the Plaintiffs, Cisco contracted with the Chinese government to help build the country’s “great firewall” in addition to developing surveillance systems used by the government to commit human rights abuses. The case has been pending since 2014 while a series of appeals were processed after an initial dismissal by the trial court. Recently, however, the 9th Circuit ruled that the case can proceed. The court stated:

“The action was brought by practitioners of Falun Gong who alleged that they or family members were victims of human rights abuses by the Chinese Communist Party and Chinese government officials and that these abuses were enabled by technological assistance of U.S. corporation Cisco Systems, Inc., and two Cisco executives.”

The lawsuit and subsequent appeals center on the Plaintiffs’ use of the Alien Torts Statute (ATS), a law that allows non-US citizens to sue US companies for certain unlawful activities committed abroad. This law was also recently used in the high-profile Chiquita suit where the company was found liable for $38.2 million in damages due to their affiliation with the terrorist organization Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC). The history and application of the ATS is long and complicated, but the 9th Circuit’s decision could lead to more companies being sued under the law for enabling unlawful conduct, not just perpetrating it. This has major implications for U.S. companies operating internationally, especially those that contract with entities that may be violating human rights. Given the potential risk, it would be prudent to consider expanding your company’s supplier human rights due diligence assessment process to your foreign customers.

Our members can learn more about ESG litigation here.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here for daily updates delivered right to you.

Photo Credit: JHVEPhoto – stock.adobe.com

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile