CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

When Meredith and I were drafting our sample disclosure based on the final SEC rules (members can access that here), she brought up an interesting point about physical risks – business exposures (e.g., property damage or loss) resulting from weather events. We discussed that while certain aspects of physical risk may be hypothetical, it is risky to claim climate-based physical risks as hypothetical if the company has actually faced such events in the past. Last week, Cydney Posner of Cooley wrote about this concept, albeit in relation to an SEC enforcement “mini-sweep” on cyber risk – but the lesson still is relevant to climate disclosures. According to Cydney:

“the SEC announced settled charges against four companies for ‘making materially misleading disclosures regarding cybersecurity risks and intrusions…” The SEC charged that each of these companies learned that the ‘threat actor’ that was probably the cause of the SolarWinds hack had ‘accessed their systems without authorization, but each negligently minimized its cybersecurity incident in its public disclosures.’ In two instances, the companies were alleged to have framed their disclosures as hypothetical or generic risks… Jorge G. Tenreiro, Acting Chief of the Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit, cautioned that ‘[d]ownplaying the extent of a material cybersecurity breach is a bad strategy… In two of these cases, the relevant cybersecurity risk factors were framed hypothetically or generically when the companies knew the warned of risks had already materialized.  The federal securities laws prohibit half-truths, and there is no exception for statements in risk-factor disclosures.’”

Meredith wrote about the dissenting opinion from Commissioners Peirce and Uyeda.

Again, we have to look past the cyber element of this and think about it in the setting of climate risk disclosures: if your company has experienced past losses as a result of a hurricane, for instance – can you consider future physical hurricane losses hypothetical? Probably not a good idea.

Our members can learn more about ESG disclosures and reporting here.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Lawrence Heim has been practicing in the field of ESG management for almost 40 years. He began his career as a legal assistant in the Environmental Practice of Vinson & Elkins working for a partner who is nationally recognized and an adjunct professor of environmental law at the University of Texas Law School. He moved into technical environmental consulting with ENSR Consulting & Engineering at the height of environmental regulatory development, working across a range of disciplines. He was one… View Profile