CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Last month, an interesting question was posed on our Q&A Forum of importance to anyone conducting double materiality assessments (DMAs). DMAs involve communicating with stakeholders on their views of the importance of myriad ESG topics. Shareholders/investors are, of course, one category of stakeholder. However, communications with shareholders/investors are in many instances governed by the SEC (for companies subject to Commission jurisdiction). And there’s the rub –


Can outreach to shareholder/investors soliciting their input to a DMA be considered “solicitation” under SEC regulations?


John Jenkins provided his thoughts:

“Rule 14a-1 is broad, and any communication to security holders ‘under circumstances reasonably calculated to result in the procurement, withholding or revocation of a proxy’ is encompassed within its definition of the term ‘solicitation.’ But that still leaves a lot of room for engagement with shareholders about topics that they are interested in without violating the proxy rules.

I think there’s a very good argument that, in most situations, general off-season engagement with shareholders on these topics is likely not to be regarded as solicitation. There’s no meeting looming, there are no specific items on the agenda, etc. There’s also safety in numbers – many, many companies engage with their shareholders on various topics outside of proxy season without filing any sort of proxy materials. That suggests that neither the companies involved nor the SEC find this kind of ordinary course engagement particularly troubling.”

ESG/sustainability leaders, staff and advisors: Once again, a situation arises where ESG/sustainability management intersects with US securities regulatory risks. While John suggests outreach to shareholders for DMA input as “general off-season engagement” may not be solicitation, it must be done within certain guardrails. Seeking input from a shareholder that has shown interest in ESG by submitting an ESG-related proposal (or is planning one) may be particularly tricky. Your securities counsel may become your new best friend.

Our members can learn more about shareholder engagement here.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Lawrence Heim has been practicing in the field of ESG management for almost 40 years. He began his career as a legal assistant in the Environmental Practice of Vinson & Elkins working for a partner who is nationally recognized and an adjunct professor of environmental law at the University of Texas Law School. He moved into technical environmental consulting with ENSR Consulting & Engineering at the height of environmental regulatory development, working across a range of disciplines. He was one… View Profile