CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

The EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is a massive piece of disclosure legislation that sustainability professionals are struggling to wrap their heads around. Even as we work to understand and comply with the current European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), more complexity is on the way as phased-in implementation of CSRD ratchets up. One of the biggest challenges will be reporting for in-scope non-EU companies required to report on sustainability issues at their global enterprise level. While the final ESRS for Non-EU Groups (NESRS) will not be published by EFRAG until June 2026, EFRAG recently published exposure drafts, giving more details on what to expect. The NESRS are broken up into two documents NESRS 1: General Requirements and NESRS 2: General Disclosures. Ropes & Gray discusses the drafts in a recent memo stating:

“The working paper cross-cutting NESRS largely track ESRS 1 and ESRS 2. The differences primarily are to take into account the reporting requirements specific to non-EU parent groups contemplated by article 40a. Under article 40a, parent group-level reporting would cover impact but not financial materiality (i.e., not risk and opportunity). As a result, resilience, opportunities, principal risks and dependencies, which are related to financial materiality, have been excluded from the NESRS. Otherwise, the NESRS are structured in the same manner as the ESRS. A materiality assessment for impact would still be required under NESRS 1.”

It won’t just be non-European reporting adding complexity to the CSRD, EFRAG is also set to publish new sector-specific ESRS that will introduce new reporting requirements for certain sectors. The first round of CSRD reports are due to the EU authorities by January 1, once those are publicly available more best practices are expected to emerge. We’ll also see which areas draw enforcement scrutiny and how much leeway EU market authorities are willing to grant during the CSRD’s phase-in period.

Our members can learn more about the CSRD here.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile