CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Continuing the theme of federal changes … the new administration is aggressively pushing a “business friendly” deregulation agenda at the federal level – and EPA is one of the top targets.  While that started with climate matters, once the ball gets rolling I expect to see a seismic shift in the overall environmental regulatory landscape. Everything from Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) mandates to water quality, hazardous waste management, site remediation and environmental justice will be affected.

However, this federal pullback will have minimal impact on most corporate environmental activities and programs.

Why?

Environmental professionals already know the answer, but if your role is supporting the environmental function, you may not.

Most environmental regulatory programs were delegated to state agencies decades ago. Federal environmental laws for air emissions, wastewater discharge, water quality, waste management and site remediation contain provisions for states to obtain “primacy” or “delegation” of those regulatory programs. EPA retains an oversight and review role only in these cases. The last time I checked, at least 48 states had achieved that. Certain programs are still managed at the federal level – such as the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA), EIS/environmental justice, environmental crimes and chemical reporting under the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA).


While new federal environmental regulation development and enforcement of existing mandates may slow or retreat, day-to-day environmental compliance management won’t see much change. States will continue to implement and enforce their programs, as well as proceed with regulatory development independent of what happens in Washington.


If anything, states may feel more pressure to execute their regulatory responsibilities. Companies must continue to be vigilant in managing day-to-day environmental compliance. Even if there was an opening for companies to lift up off the compliance pedal, significant financial risks remain of third party lawsuits along with violations of previous settlements and financing covenants, contract terms and insurance coverage terms.

Members can read more about environmental compliance and enforcement here.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Lawrence Heim has been practicing in the field of ESG management for almost 40 years. He began his career as a legal assistant in the Environmental Practice of Vinson & Elkins working for a partner who is nationally recognized and an adjunct professor of environmental law at the University of Texas Law School. He moved into technical environmental consulting with ENSR Consulting & Engineering at the height of environmental regulatory development, working across a range of disciplines. He was one… View Profile