CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Over the decades, I’ve seen two main approaches to pricing products with regard to sustainability:

  • Premium pricing (a “greenium”) that effectively considers sustainability attributes a luxury factor justifying higher price tags than comparable “standard” products. Sometimes this reflects customer trends/demands (e.g., clothing, organic food, electronics/appliances), but it can also higher costs of new technology/materials (e.g., EVs, sneakers). This is common in consumer products.
  • Lower prices resulting from reduced operating expenses from successful energy efficiency programs (e.g., solar power, reduced electricity demand), transportation efficiencies (e.g., more products per vehicle or per mile) or lower material costs (e.g., using recyclable/secondary materials, reduced packaging). Generally, I’ve seen this more frequently in B2B situations.

Makes sense, but these aren’t rules and things don’t always fall neatly into place like this. For instance:

I went to buy new heads for my electric toothbrush last week and was flummoxed by what I found. A small package containing two heads was 50% more expensive than a larger package from the same brand containing a complete electric toothbrush and an extra head. Moreover, the heads were placed several feet from the complete toothbrushes – reducing chances that buyers would compare these prices.

How is it that the heads alone in a smaller package are so much more expensive than the larger package made up of more material overall (battery, electronics, plastic housing, and same heads)?


Companies should consider a third approach or factor: common sense pricing that encourages consumer trust in corporate sustainability claims – especially across adjacent products.


Sustainability leaders, staff and advisors – you may participate in new product development strategies, it is also important to have at least some involvement in pricing for existing products. Sure, loss leaders have a place in the market, but wildly disparate price points for adjacent products or replacement parts frustrate customers and undercut the credibility/sincerity of your company’s sustainability efforts. It is possible these situations could even be used as evidence against a company in greenwashing lawsuits.

Members can learn more about sustainability business strategies here.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Lawrence Heim has been practicing in the field of ESG management for almost 40 years. He began his career as a legal assistant in the Environmental Practice of Vinson & Elkins working for a partner who is nationally recognized and an adjunct professor of environmental law at the University of Texas Law School. He moved into technical environmental consulting with ENSR Consulting & Engineering at the height of environmental regulatory development, working across a range of disciplines. He was one… View Profile