CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Apparel company Lululemon is feeling relief after a federal court in the Southern District of Florida dismissed a punitive class action against the company. The case alleged that Lululemon’s “Be Planet” advertising campaign was false and misleading and sought to recover under various consumer protection laws. The court found that plaintiffs did not adequately plead their case and dismissed it for lack of standing. Foley & Lardner discusses the reasons for the dismissal in a recent memo:

“The court dismissed plaintiffs’ claims, which were premised on alleged violations of various states’ consumer protection statutes. First, the court found the plaintiffs failed to adequately plead an injury in fact to support claims for monetary damages. The court highlighted that ‘mere allegations of having paid a price premium are insufficient — a plaintiff must tie the value of the product to any purported misrepresentations.’… The plaintiffs’ complaint failed to allege Lululemon’s products were defective or worthless. Moreover, the plaintiffs failed to allege deceptive or unfair acts as to the products themselves, failing to connect the allegedly problematic ‘Be Planet’ statements to the price premium the plaintiffs alleged that they paid for Lululemon’s products.”

While the Florida case may not be moving forward, Lululemon isn’t necessarily out of the woods. The Canadian government is still investigating the company regarding the same ad campaign at the center of the Florida case, as we wrote about last spring. Greenwashing cases based on consumer protection laws can be tricky to prove and its especially hard to put a hard dollar value on the premiums consumers will pay for more sustainable products. However, companies still suffer reputational harm from the often highly public cases calling their sustainability claims into question and diluting the effectiveness of their marketing.

Our members can learn more about greenwashing here.

If you aren’t already subscribed to our complimentary ESG blog, sign up here for daily updates delivered right to you.

Photo credit: JHVEPhoto – stock.adobe.com

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile