CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Just over a year ago, I began planning a research project to analyze how (or if) companies formally disclose financial gains/ROI of sustainability initiatives and investments. In the intervening months, project details changed somewhat and today the initial draft is done. The document is undergoing final review, edits and formatting and should be available within 2-3 weeks, but here are some highlights in the meantime:

  • In our cohort of 113 publicly traded US companies, only 27% reported financial value/gains/benefit of sustainability in their 10-K reports. Only 34% reported financial value/gains/benefit of sustainability in their sustainability/ESG reports.
  • Sustainability financial reporting/ROI disclosure, where it occurs at all, does not correlate to company size or sustainability reputation.
  • Sustainability financial value/ROI disclosure, where it occurs at all, appears to take forms other than financial statements and corporate sustainability reports (such as media reports, press releases, public statements/presentations by company officials and social media).
  • Almost every company reported sustainability/climate matters as an Item 1A Business Risk, infrequently balanced by discussions or data about potential upsides, value or ROI.
  • Overall, the current state of sustainability disclosures in a financial context supports the perception that sustainability consists of charitable expenditures and business risks driving possible negative business conditions.

However, there are several relatively easy ways to turn this around, even if you face pushback from some parts of your organization. Indeed, this will be one of the matters that Zach will address our upcoming webcast for members “ESG Litigation Landscape 2025” on August 12 at 2:00 EST. The discussion will center on developing legal risks and the strategies companies can use to mitigate legal exposure – which includes building a viable business case.

We focused on US publicly-traded companies and searched for hard dollar value (top line or bottom line) reported in 10-Ks and sustainability/ESG/CSR reports, only including those that provide explicit dollar values (or clearly/easily calculated values such as percentages of total company revenue or cost line items). Non-financial operational metrics are not included. We also exclude cost items, risk reduction claims, predictions of potential future benefits not yet realized and general narratives without explicit financial values/benefits.

Companies were selected to represent a range of annual revenues (from -$149 million to over $390 billion) and a variety manufacturing, retail and service industry sectors.  Most were selected at random, but others were chosen based on their general reputation as sustainability leaders or recent news of specific major sustainability-related announcements to compare their reputation to how/whether they report financial value of sustainability.

We conducted our research manually without using AI. It would be easy to think that the results could be quickly replicated using any popular AI system available. Think again – as a point of curiosity, we compared some of our results to results produced by common publicly available AI systems and found significant discrepancies and omissions in the AI results versus our manual reviews of the source documents.

If you would like to see us replicate the study using non-US companies, send us a note. If there is enough feedback, we’ll do it – and now that we have things ironed out, it won’t take us as long this time.


Members have access to this research and more. If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then.

Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information compiled without the use of AI.

Are you a client of one of our Partners – SourceIntelligence, Kumi, Ecolumix, Elm Consulting Group International or Impakt IQ? Contact them for exclusive pricing packages for PracticalESG.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Lawrence Heim has been practicing in the field of ESG management for 40 years. He began his career as a legal assistant in the Environmental Practice of Vinson & Elkins working for a partner who is nationally recognized and an adjunct professor of environmental law at the University of Texas Law School. He moved into technical environmental consulting with ENSR Consulting & Engineering at the height of environmental regulatory development, working across a range of disciplines. He was one of… View Profile