CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

The last couple years have seen enough scandals in the voluntary carbon offset world to lose count. Yet voluntary carbon market (VCM) developers, certifiers and investors continued to be upbeat.  Yesterday, however, Responsible Investor reported the most tangible evidence that things aren’t going so well – although perhaps not due to offset quality concerns.

“The Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative (VCMI) has blamed a loss of confidence in the voluntary market for carbon offsets for an underwhelming public response to its voluntary standard… only two companies have announced VCMI-compliant claims since the rules were launched – Bain & Company and Natura.

VCMI’s executive director Mark Kenber said the issue is ‘less about reluctance to comply, and more about hesitation to make public claims’.

‘Intense public scrutiny and reputational damage caused by the ‘wild west’ era of less rigorous market practices has led companies to be understandably cautious about making public statements about carbon credit use, even if it is high integrity,’ he added.”

VCMI also claims “that the business case for carbon market engagement has been eroded and that governments may need to play more of a signalling role to show that rules for voluntary offset markets are becoming more aligned and stable.” The organization is expected to publish a report on these points later this week.

I’m not sure what the message is here: “offset quality is okay and companies continue to use them – but they won’t talk about it, the business case for them has softened and we need governmental intervention to help a voluntary market”?? Doesn’t seem particularly comforting.

Members can learn more about carbon offsets here and also have access to our Checklist Identifying & Updating Climate Risks and Uncertainties.


DID YOU KNOW … we are much more than just blogs. PracticalESG provides tools and guidance for in house staff and outside advisors – from beginners to senior practitioners. We scour third party resources, vetting and filtering them – saving you hours of your day. And we don’t use AI to produce any content or have annoying ads.


If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Lawrence Heim has been practicing in the field of ESG management for 40 years. He began his career as a legal assistant in the Environmental Practice of Vinson & Elkins working for a partner who is nationally recognized and an adjunct professor of environmental law at the University of Texas Law School. He moved into technical environmental consulting with ENSR Consulting & Engineering at the height of environmental regulatory development, working across a range of disciplines. He was one of… View Profile