CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

After years of inaction at the federal level, climate policy proponents increasingly turned towards state governments to enact change. Through state tort lawsuits and state-level legislation, activists and policymakers pushed for accountability from fossil fuel companies. Now, the federal government is attempting to step in and quash these efforts. The EPA is challenging Vermont’s “Climate Superfund” law, and in ongoing Colorado litigation, the DOJ has filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court in support of fossil fuel companies. Both argue similar themes: that federal energy policy preempts state law. The motion in the Vermont litigation states:

“By regulating global greenhouse gas emissions based on conduct outside Vermont—and outside the United States—the Superfund Act flouts federal law and our constitutional structure. First, the Clean Air Act preempts it because it regulates domestic greenhouse gas emissions that originate out of state.”

And the amicus brief in the Colorado legislation states:

“Allowing Colorado to deem the effects of the companies’ worldwide conduct tortious ‘cannot be reconciled with the decisionmaking scheme Congress enacted’ in the Clean Air Act, which precludes any such role for a single State.”

Previously, the Supreme Court has been reluctant to weigh in on state climate tort claims. SCOTUS has repeatedly dodged the question, giving no concrete authority on the matter. However, with the administration putting its thumb on the scales, we will likely get a dispositive ruling on whether the Clean Air Act preempts state law. This could set climate litigation back significantly if the courts find in favor of fossil fuel companies.

Our members can learn more about climate litigation here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then.

Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information compiled without the use of AI.

Are you a client of one of our Partners – SourceIntelligence, TRC, Kumi, Ecolumix, Elm Consulting Group International or Impakt IQ? Contact them for exclusive pricing packages for PracticalESG.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile