CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

McKinsey recently published a short and very interesting article Bias Busters: When the question—not the answer—is the mistake. While not specifically about sustainability, it very much speaks to practitioners. If you aren’t familiar with “framing”, it is

“a well-documented cognitive bias in which people with identical information make different decisions based on how the information is presented. Research by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman showed that the way a problem is presented can heavily influence the options people consider and the decisions they make…

A frequent consequence of the framing effect is asking misguided questions. In business settings, framing an issue too narrowly or embedding unchallenged assumptions often leads teams to ask the wrong question.”

Nobel Laureate Richard Thaler is another who has widely researched and published on the matter. It is a hidden epidemic in sustainability, although not new.

McKinsey offers suggestions to counter bias, including

“challenging the problem’s definition. Rather than accepting the frame as given, teams benefit from broadening their inquiry. One proven debiasing method is to invite constructive dissent—devil’s advocates, challengers, or red team–blue team exercises—not just to question answers, but to question the questions.”

The bias that sustainability is an absolute business essential – with subsequent self-aggrandization – were primary reasons for its downfall in the 1990s. Hopefully, we can learn from that and not repeat it (see Killing Sustainability – members have free access). Here are a few examples of common sustainability questions I question:

What other biased questions can you think of, and how can those be reframed in a way that moves your program forward?

Finally, today is September 11. I hope you can find a moment for quiet remembrance, whether at work or home.

Members can learn more about the business value of sustainability here, as well as in Guidebooks Communicating ESG Value and Simplifying ESG/Sustainability Business Value.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then.

Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information compiled without the use of AI.

Are you a client of one of our Partners – SourceIntelligence, TRC, Kumi, Ecolumix, Elm Consulting Group International or Impakt IQ? Contact them for exclusive pricing packages for PracticalESG.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Lawrence Heim has been practicing in the field of ESG management for 40 years. He began his career as a legal assistant in the Environmental Practice of Vinson & Elkins working for a partner who is nationally recognized and an adjunct professor of environmental law at the University of Texas Law School. He moved into technical environmental consulting with ENSR Consulting & Engineering at the height of environmental regulatory development, working across a range of disciplines. He was one of… View Profile