CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

We previously wrote about a group of youth plaintiffs suing the US government over recent changes in federal energy policy. Their lawsuit challenging three executive orders promulgated earlier this year has been dismissed. The Montana court ruled that the relief sought by Plaintiffs exceeded the Article III powers of the courts. A recent ArentFox memo provides details:

“While the court accepted that the plaintiffs demonstrated both injury and causation, it nevertheless concluded that the requested relief exceeds judicial power because it would require indefinite monitoring of the executive branch. The opinion underscores that courts cannot ‘wind back the clock’ on an Administration’s energy policy or police compliance across scores of agencies without clear and manageable standards.”

The lawsuit’s core facts and arguments were based on the previous successful Montana youth climate suit. However, unlike the previous suit, this case made federal law claims against a federal agency. State constitutions often include additional rights that plaintiffs can use to build their cases. While these state cases have seen success in Montana and Hawaii, federal climate claims have floundered.

This likely won’t be the last legal challenge to federal energy policy. The suit may have been dismissed, but climate plaintiffs will continue to adapt their arguments and try new strategies. The big takeaway from this case is that requests for relief must be narrowly tailored and not require courts to monitor the executive in perpetuity.

Our members can learn more about climate litigation here.

If you’re not already a PracticalESG.com member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information compiled without the use of AI.

Are you a client of one of our Partners – SourceIntelligence, TRC, Kumi, Ecolumix, Elm Consulting Group International or Impakt IQ? Contact them for exclusive pricing packages for PracticalESG.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile