CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Back in spring, we wrote about a pending lawsuit against Bumblebee Foods brought by foreign plaintiffs in US courts. It alleges that Bumblebee Foods knew or should have known that its suppliers were using forced labor. The case has now moved beyond the preliminary stages, surviving a Motion to Dismiss from Bumblebee. The Business & Human Rights Resource Centre discusses the court’s ruling in a recent article:

“The court ruled that the fishers presented sufficient allegations of forced labor as defined by the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, noting that Bumble Bee did not contest the fishers were subject to forced labor. The court also found that Bumble Bee ‘likely had ‘notice about the prevalence’ of forced labor on the vessels from which it sourced tuna, ‘failed to take adequate steps to train staff in order to prevent its occurrence,’ had an ‘active role in obtaining albacore tuna from the vessels on which Plaintiffs were subject to forced labor,’ and resold the tuna for profit…”

This case is similar to the Chiquita case in Florida and BNP Paribas case in New York. Both of those cases saw US courts hold companies liable for enabling human rights abuses in other countries.

Companies continue to be held accountable for activity that occurs in their supply chains, even if that isn’t under their direct control. Supply chain management continues to be a major challenge, and failure to mitigate human rights abuses comes with real costs.

Our members can learn more about supply chain management here.

Interested in a full membership with access to the complete range of benefits and resources? Sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information compiled without the use of AI.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile