CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Another greenwashing settlement for a meat producer… Tyson Foods and NGO Environmental Working Group (EWG) settled their litigation. The Tyson case, which we originally wrote about back in September 2024, is very similar to the JBS case. However, the settlements are quite different. A recent memo from Kelley Drye outlines how Tyson’s settlement imposes more restrictions on the company’s marketing practices:

“Tyson’s settlement with EWG, by comparison, establishes a far more restrictive regime: for the next five years, Tyson is prohibited from making net zero or ​’climate-smart’ beef claims unless the claims are first reviewed and substantiated by a mutually agreed independent expert. As a result, JBS can continue to articulate its goals with careful wording and annual compliance reviews, whereas Tyson cannot reenter this space without external scientific validation.”

Where JBS is still allowed to talk about its climate goals in an aspirational context, Tyson is completely barred from doing so without external approval. The case highlights the continued risk of greenwashing litigation. While federal agencies may not be enforcing greenwashing rules, NGOs and states are still eager plaintiffs. Tyson’s settlement is not only reputationally damaging but also represents wasted time and effort in a doomed marketing campaign. Companies should be certain that any sustainability claims in their advertising are adequately supported and avoid marketing themselves based on aspirational goals.

Our members can learn more about greenwashing here.

Interested in a full membership with access to the complete range of benefits and resources? Sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information compiled without the use of AI.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile