CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

We’ve previously written about how the DOJ is looking to root out “illegal DEI” among government contractors. One tool the DOJ is using is the False Claims Act (FCA). Normally, the FCA is used to combat financial fraud among federal contractors, but the DOJ has taken a novel interpretation to target DEI. A recent Freshfield’s memo breaks down how the DOJ may use the FCA to enforce against DEI programs:

“In the DEI context, this framework theoretically empowers the government to pursue enforcement against contractors that certify compliance with federal law but engage in practices the administration considers to be ‘illegal DEI.’

From a compliance perspective, this development means companies that receive federal funds should ensure that legal, contracting, and HR or employment teams are coordinated. Among other things, recipients of federal funds may face information demands or audits of DEI programs, raising the potential for both Title VII and FCA risk.”

While the memo notes that 2025 saw little DEI-related enforcement, 2026 could be different. With midterm elections on the horizon, the administration will look to make a statement on one of its primary campaign promises. Additionally, 2025 marked the beginning of new litigation strategies and investigations that may bear fruit in courtrooms in 2026. Right now, the rules about what constitutes “illegal DEI” are unclear. However, this ambiguity may favor defendants in any resulting litigation.   Companies, especially those working with the US government, should review their DEI programs and policies.

Our members can learn more about ESG litigation here.

Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information compiled without the use of AI.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile