CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

There’s no shortage of pending climate cases against the oil and gas industry. States, municipalities, and private citizens impacted by severe weather events have been trying for years to land a big verdict. Many compare the litigation to the big tobacco cases of the 80’s and 90’s or more recent opioid litigation that resulted in huge judgments. One trouble climate cases face in going mainstream is causation. Proving that the actions of specific companies resulted in specific harms is made difficult by the nature of climate change. However, that hasn’t stopped Plaintiffs who have continued to advance theories of causation through new climate attribution science. A recent Simmons + Simmons memo discusses this trend, stating:

“A significant trend in 2025 was the continued attempt to advance liability theories based on climate attribution science. If successful, these theories could dramatically expand corporate liability for the effects of climate change. Courts in Germany and England have begun to opine on these theories, with the German courts in particular acknowledging that major emitters can, in principle, be held liable for their contribution to climate-related harm globall[y] [sic].”

Last year, we saw a study outlining an “end-to-end” attribution method claiming to scientifically prove certain emissions are related to certain weather events. We also saw one lawsuit attempt to circumvent this hurdle by using rising insurance rates as a proxy. However, the court system takes time, and these theories are not immediately testable. We’ll see if 2026 holds any major developments for climate attribution science and which, if any, methods hold up in court.

Our members can learn more about ESG litigation here.

Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information compiled without the use of AI.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile