CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

In more climate litigation news out of Michigan, a district court judge dismissed the administration’s lawsuit to block climate litigation. The admin’s lawsuit was filed preemptively, after learning that the Michigan AG was collecting information for the climate litigation discussed in today’s previous blog. The suit attempted to stop the AG from pursuing state law claims against the fossil fuel industry. The Michigan AG stated in a press release that:

“On Saturday, Judge Jane M. Beckering of the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan dismissed a Trump Administration lawsuit (PDF) that sought to prohibit the State of Michigan from filing state-law claims against the fossil fuel industry related to climate impacts. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit last year. Judge Beckering agreed with the Attorney General and dismissed the case, finding that the Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction under the Constitution to hear the case because the dispute was not ripe for adjudication and because the United States did not establish that it had standing to bring the case.”

We’ll see if the federal government attempts to refile or appeal the suit now that the Michigan AG has filed its antitrust litigation, which may impact the administration’s standing. However, efforts to shut down state-related climate claims have thus far proven ineffective. The administration’s loss in the district court is in line with how federal courts have handled such attempts in the past.

Our members can learn more about climate litigation here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information compiled without the use of AI.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile