CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

ESG ratings and ratings agencies have been subject to scrutiny since their inception. The benefits are clear enough. Ratings help investors and other stakeholders quickly assess a company’s ESG credentials. However, the reality is more complex. Ratings methodologies are often proprietary “black boxes” and some accuse ratings agencies of self-dealing with their consultancy arms. A new study looks at the ratings landscape in the UK and EU. It regards raters as “regulatory intermediaries” and finds that policies must support increased trust between these intermediaries, and markets on the whole:

“Regulatory intermediaries play a central role in the allocation of trust to regulatory agents. This holds for both trust-building and trust-repair policies. At their best, intermediaries reinforce regulation via trust, and they regulate trust via regulation. At worst, intermediaries undermine trust in regulation and trust-based regulation; hence the issue of ‘washing’ strategies such as greenwashing. Whether trust is treated as an alternative or as a complement to regulation, such approaches implicitly perceive trust as necessarily a good thing, allowing for more win-win outcomes. Distrust, or the destruction of trust, is then something to be repaired, including by way of regulatory intervention.”

The study examines the impact that UK and EU ratings legislation has had on trustworthiness. It finds that the regulation of raters by governments can help improve trust in ratings. This is something I wrote about back in 2023, when ratings regulations were getting off the ground. Ultimately, ratings may not be perfect, but the EU and UK have come a long way towards building reliable, sustainable finance metrics.

Our members can learn more about ESG ratings here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information compiled without the use of AI.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile