CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

In more greenwashing news, Australian energy company Santos also won its high-profile greenwashing case. Plaintiffs in this case argued that Santos misled investors when it set emissions reduction targets in 2020. Those targets failed to materialize, and shareholders sued, arguing that no clear path to those reductions existed. The Federal Court of Australia disagreed, finding that Santos’ targets were reasonable future-looking statements.  A memo from A&O Shearman discusses the court’s reasoning:

“The court also considered the reasonableness of Santos’ 2030 target and net-zero roadmap, conducting a detailed analysis of evidence adduced by Santos supporting the targets. This included analyzing the reasonableness of Santos’ assertions that carbon capture and storage would be used to avoid or abate emissions. Importantly, the court found the following:

  • Santos had reasonable grounds for its baseline emissions assumptions, and for its assumptions regarding hydrogen with carbon capture and storage forming part of its roadmap to net-zero emissions.
  • The relevant targets were the product of years of strategic development regarding a potential market for hydrogen and were not rushed decisions.
  • Santos’ net-zero roadmap was presented in a way that conveyed an appropriate level of uncertainty and flexibility.
  • Santos had clearly indicated that certain activities, such as expansion of carbon capture and storage, were “planned” and conditional.”

I’ve written before about how US securities law treats forward-looking statements. It’s harder for shareholders to argue that these are misleading because the future is uncertain. We’ve seen several cases filed arguing that net-zero targets and commitments are false and misleading. So far, we haven’t seen any wins on this theory.

Our members can learn more about ESG litigation here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile