CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

GHG emissions aren’t the only target of the administration’s deregulatory agenda. Pollution reduction and environmental waste management are in the crosshairs. This includes the regulation of highly toxic air pollutants. In 2015, the EPA established new Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS). These standards targeted mercury, lead, and other pollutants released by power plants. The current EPA repealed these standards, leading to measurable increases in air pollution. However, the National Resource Defense Council (NRDC) and a coalition of advocacy groups are challenging this repeal. The NRDC summarizes its arguments in a press release:

“Since the Trump administration gave the country’s dirtiest coal plants a free pass, sulfur dioxide emissions have increased 18 percent nationally and neurotoxic mercury emissions have risen 9 percent. The sulfur dioxide spike was the second-largest single-year jump by percentage since the EPA began publishing this data 30 years ago.

Today’s lawsuit also challenges the EPA’s rollback of real-time continuous emissions monitoring at power plants, which would have given communities accurate real-time data on the pollution they’re breathing and a stronger tool for enforcing compliance. The repeal violates the Clean Air Act, ignores the scientific record, and abandons safeguards that protect communities living near coal plants and downwind of their pollution.”

This challenge may have impacts on climate policy and vice versa. Another lawsuit is currently ongoing challenging the EPA’s repeal of its 2009 GHG endangerment finding. If either of these cases establishes that the EPA has an obligation to regulate known hazardous air pollutants, then it would set precedent applicable to the other.

Our members can learn more about ESG litigation here.

Interested in a membership with access to the complete range of benefits and resources? Sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile