CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Kansas’s anti-ESG investing law is on ice as a trial court recently issued a preliminary injunction barring enforcement. The court found that the law likely violates the First Amendment and stayed the law pending the outcome of litigation. Kansas’s SB 375 requires proxy advisors to make certain disclaimers regarding ESG. ISS considers these disclaimers false and misleading. The proxy advisory giant challenged the law on grounds that it unconstitutionally compelled speech. In a press release, ISS discusses the injunction:

“The Kansas district court found this structure to be viewpoint-based on its face and concluded that ISS is likely to succeed on the merits of its First Amendment claim. Kansas declined to argue the law could survive strict scrutiny.

Kansas SB 375 was not a transparency law, and it was not in the interest of American investors or businesses. It required ISS to declare — to clients, to company boards, and publicly — that certain of its recommendations are not based on financial analysis. That declaration is false and its requirement threatens free speech. ISS recommendations reflect rigorous analysis applied to client-selected criteria.”

A similar situation played out in Texas courts over their anti-ESG investing law. However, in that case, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s injunction allowing the law to continue for the time being. Ultimately, these lawsuits are likely to end up in the appeals courts. If circuit splits emerge, we may even see the Supreme Court weigh in at some point in the future.

Our members can learn more about ESG litigation here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

 

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile