CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

After delaying 2026 SB 253 reporting last month, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) recently hosted a workshop discussing new requirements for 2027 emissions reporting under SB 253. 2027 will mark the first year that SB 253 reports will require Scope 3 data, and CARB is still ironing out the regulatory details. CARB will propose rules later this year containing the concepts and requirements discussed at the workshop. A recent Sullivan & Cromwell memo reviews the core general requirements put forward at the workshop:

  • Quantification Methodologies. Companies would be required to disclose the GHG quantification methods and measurement approaches used for the calculation of all emissions in their SB 253 reports, including consolidation approach for organizational boundaries, Global Warming Potential values and assessment report vintage, emission factor sources for all calculations with key attributes, and quantification method (e.g., direct measurement or calculation-based method), including any process-specific tools or models used.
  • Measurement Uncertainty. Companies would be required to assess the uncertainty associated with the quantification methodologies used to calculate emissions, including a quantitative explanation where applicable. Where quantitative estimation of uncertainty is not feasible or would impose unreasonable burden or cost, the company must provide an explanation and conduct a qualitative assessment of uncertainty.
  • Missing Data Protocols and Substitution Procedure. Companies would be required to identify missing data elements or parameters and document any substitute data sources or estimation methods used to quantify emissions in place of the missing data.
  • Reporting Biogenic Emissions. CARB staff previewed draft regulatory language that would require companies to report biogenic CO2 emissions from the combustion, consumption or biodegradation of biomass and biomethane in their SB 253 reports, and for such emissions to be reported separately from Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions totals.
  • Reporting Emissions Reductions or Removals. Companies may report voluntary investments (e.g., carbon credits, offsets), management activities or other activities that result in fossil or biogenic emissions reductions or removals. These voluntary investments or management activities must be reported separately from Scope 1, 2 or 3 emissions.)
  • Data Exclusions. Companies would be permitted to exclude GHG emissions sources, activities, Scope 3 categories or other information ‘where the omission, misstatement, or obscuring could not be reasonably expected to influence the decisions, assessments, or understanding of users of the disclosure regarding the reporting entity’s GHG emissions inventory, climate-related risks, opportunities, or impacts.’ CARB is currently planning to propose requiring companies to assess data exclusions using both quantitative and qualitative factors, and to explain and disclose the basis for all data exclusions. For each category, source, facility, operation, or disclosure excluded, the company would also be required to disclose an estimate of the emissions magnitude of exclusions, if quantifiable.
  • Notifying CARB of Changes to Methodologies. In annual GHG reports, companies would be required to include disclosures of changes to GHG quantification or accounting methods made from the previous reporting year or during the current reporting period, and the reasons for those changes.
  • Recalculation of Previous Year Data. Companies that change their GHG emissions calculation methodologies (including for corporate structuring or accounting reasons) would be required to determine whether the cumulative effect of all structural and methodological changes would result in a change greater than 5% of their total GHG emissions for the base year (i.e., their first reporting year under SB 253). If so, the company must recalculate the reported emissions for all affected previous reporting years, and the updated emissions data for those years must be included in the next annual GHG emissions report along with a description of the changes that led to the recalculation.”

Our members can learn more about GHG disclosures here.

Interested in a membership with access to the complete range of benefits and resources? Sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile