CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

A lot of people believe that investments included in sustainability funds have great environmental performance. Oftentimes, financial firms choose investments for these funds based on a company’s ESG ratings. However, these ratings don’t weigh environmental, social, and governance issues equally. Ratings agencies each have unique methodologies and assign weight to ESG issues differently. A recent study from Lumin found environmental factors were given less weight than social and governance issues in most cases:

“ESG ratings assess the three sustainability dimensions: Environment, Social and Governance. The weighting of these three components within an ESG rating can vary depending on the company and the rating agency. Lumin’s analysis shows that the environmental dimension is typically assigned the lowest weighting. In the UK equity market (FTSE 100), for example, the environmental component accounts for around 20 percent according to MSCI ESG ratings, while the social and governance dimensions each represent approximately 40 percent.”

This means that ESG funds may not always meet investors’ expectations regarding environmental impacts. Retail investors do not always fully understand the nuances of how and why certain investments are chosen. This may result in funds unintentionally misleading investors. The study advises investors to approach ESG funds with caution and to take the time to learn what ratings the fund considers and the methodologies backing them. Fund name rules, ESG ratings regulation, and various sustainable finance laws are attempting to combat misunderstandings among investors. As sustainable investments grow, we’ll likely see more jurisdictions tackling these issues with regulation.

Our members can learn more about sustainable finance here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile