CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Microsoft is almost single-handedly responsible for propping up the voluntary carbon credit market. Some estimates claim that the company is responsible for 87% of all carbon removal credit purchases. Earlier this year, reporting from Bloomberg indicated that the company was pausing carbon credit purchases. This apparent pause ended the following month when the company announced a direct capture deal with BioCirc. However, despite the BioCirc deal, Bloomberg now reports that the company slowed carbon credit purchases by 80% in 2026:

“Microsoft Corp. dramatically cut back investments in carbon removals in the first half of the year, as it ratchets up spending on artificial intelligence. The company bought 8.55 million metric tons of carbon removal credits in the year through mid-July, which is about 80% less than it purchased over the same period in 2025, according to calculations by BloombergNEF. That puts Microsoft on track for its first retreat since 2023 from a market it entered in 2020.”

This reporting advances the idea that Microsoft is abandoning carbon credits in exchange for AI investment. However, the 80% figure may not tell the full story. This is a measure of how many tons of carbon removals the company purchased, not how much the company spent on carbon removals. As we saw in the BioCirc deal, Microsoft appears more interested in direct capture and sequestration projects. These projects produce some of the highest quality removal credits, but also cost more than any other method of carbon removal. In fact, direct capture CCS credits can cost more than 10x the going rate of nature-based offsets. This raises the question: has Microsoft slowed carbon credit purchases? Or is the company prioritizing quality over quantity?

Our members can learn more about carbon credits here.

Interested in a membership with access to the complete range of benefits and resources? Sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile