CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

The U.S. doesn’t have much in the way of greenhouse gas regulations. Congress has not passed any laws restricting emissions. The EPA has failed to promulgate any rules restricting emissions on an economy-wide level. The Supreme Court also made such a rule impossible in its West Virginia v. EPA ruling. The little we do have are emissions standards on major stationary sources of carbon dioxide pollution under the Clean Air Act (CAA). Primarily, this rule applied to power plants. Now the EPA is proposing to completely repeal CAA emissions regulations for power plants. The EPA’s webpage states:

“On September 14, 2026, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin signed the final Partial Repeal of the Carbon Pollution Standards for Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Generating Units. EPA supplemented this action with the proposed Rescission of the Greenhouse Gas Findings for Fossil Fuel-Fired Power Plants and Repeal of Regulations for Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under Clean Air Act Section 111.”

Initially, the EPA’s rescission efforts applied only to Biden-era rules strengthening CAA regulation. While not ideal, these repeals were fully expected. However, when issuing the repeal, the EPA also included a proposal to repeal CAA emissions regulations for power plants. The EPA’s decision to rescind the 2009 GHG endangerment finding underpins this effort. That decision is still working its way through the courts. The CAA proposal is likely to face similar legal action.

Our members can learn more about carbon management policy here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile