CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

A major environmental case in North Carolina recently settled. Three large chemical companies agreed to settle the PFAS case for $455 million. This settlement shows that PFAS litigation is making headway at a time when environmental tort litigation is struggling more generally. A press release from Chemours describes the terms of the settlement agreement:

“The terms of the Settlement, including a further description of claims released and not released, are set forth in the Settlement Agreement, which remains subject to entry of dismissals of the covered litigations. Settlement payments will total $455 million (the “Settlement Amount”) over a 15-year period beginning within 30 days of the execution date of the agreement. Chemours’ share of expected payments over the next twelve months is approximately $50 million. Of the total settlement amount, $18 million is attributed to alleged PFAS contamination unrelated to Fayetteville Works.”

Under the agreement, Chemours, DuPont, and Corteva will be responsible for 50% of the settlement funds, while DuPont and Corteva alone will cover the remaining 50%. This settlement comes at a time when PFAS production is on the rise, driven by data center development. Litigation has scared off some firms, like 3M and BASF, who deem the legal risks of PFAS production to outweigh potential profits. Others are doubling down, ensuring that the plaintiff’s bar has ample litigation fodder for years to come. We’ll see if settling a PFAS case for $455 million has a chilling effect on the chemical industry, or if firms will wait for their turn in court.

Our members can learn more about PFAS here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile