CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Back in May, I wrote about the state of climate tort suits in New Zealand. A 2024 Supreme Court decision allowed citizens to bring private litigation against parties historically responsible for emissions and recover for harms suffered as a result of climate change. Following the decision, the legislature got to work undermining the courts, drafting a ban on climate tort suits. Now they have passed the New Zealand Climate Change Response (Tort Liability) Amendment Act 2026, giving blanket tort immunity to all emitters, ensuring that no one can hold those parties responsible for knowingly contributing to climate change. A recent Linklaters memo describes the law:

“The Act inserts a new Part 8 into the Climate Change Response Act 2002 (“CCRA”), creating a statutory bar on tort liability for climate change damage caused by greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. The bar applies to any person (including the Crown) whose activity causes or contributes to GHG emissions, directly or indirectly (including Scope 3 emissions), regardless of where or when the activities, emissions or effects occur. It extends to all forms of tort liability, including novel torts, and applies to proceedings not finally determined before commencement. No compensation is payable.”

The U.S. may be in for similar treatment. Our Supreme Court is awaiting oral argument this fall in Suncor Energy v. Commissioners of Boulder County. This case is expected to answer whether state tort law is preempted by federal energy policy. However, even if SCOTUS does find in favor of the plaintiffs and allows tort litigation to continue, our own federal legislature may stand in the way. Some senators are already looking to ban climate tort suits, now they have a model framework in New Zealand’s new law.

Our members can learn more about ESG litigation here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile