In 2025, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sent a letter to several major law firms. In it, they sought demographic information about attorneys and job applicants as part of an investigation into the firms’ DEI practices. Then a group of law students stepped in and sued the EEOC. The students argued that these record requests violated their right to privacy as future applicants and lawyers. The courts didn’t get the chance to weigh in as the case was rendered moot. The EEOC conceded and declared that its investigation was over. Now the EEOC is fighting to keep the details of this short-lived investigation under wraps.
A different group of plaintiffs is dragging the EEOC back into court. These plaintiffs want to dig into exactly what the EEOC was looking for and what responses they received. To obtain this information, they filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the EEOC. The EEOC failed to produce many of the documents requested, claiming multiple exemptions. This passage from the EEOC’s recent court filing explains their legal theory:
“Although disclosure is the dominant objective of FOIA, there are several exemptions to the statute’s disclosure requirements…. ‘FOIA expressly recognizes that important interests are served by its exemptions, and those exemptions are as much a part of FOIA’s purposes and policies as the statute’s disclosure requirement[.]’ … ‘Ultimately, an agency’s justification for invoking a FOIA exemption is sufficient if it appears ‘logical’ or ‘plausible.’”
We’ll see how the court interprets these exemptions, which claim everything from protected personnel records to exemptions for presidential communications. In all likelihood, at least some of the records related to the investigation will see the light of day. Those documents might give insight into the inner workings of the EEOC’s DEI investigation.
Our members can learn more about ESG litigation here.
