CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites


A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.


An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.


The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.


Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

The EU’s European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) for the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) were officially finalized on July 31.  However, the final draft came with some surprises as the European Commission (EC) scaled back the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group’s (EFRAG) initial vision. A recent article from Responsible Investor discusses the changes and what they mean for investors and companies:

“As expected and outlined in draft rules published in early June, almost all disclosure requirements will be subject to materiality assessments.

This is a significant change from the original ESRS proposal by EU standards body FRAG, which said that all climate-related reporting as well as reporting that stems from other EU legislation – such as the indicators relevant to reporting under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) – would be mandatory.”

Initially, the ESRS was to require mandatory reporting on climate matters, regardless of a company’s own materiality assessment on the issue. However, the EC’s version of the standards allows for companies to not report on climate change if they deem the issue not material. Companies choosing this option will have to disclose a detailed explanation of their materiality assessment and explain how they came to this conclusion. This news upset investors as Responsible Investor reports:

“A letter by the PRI, the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA) and Eurosif, signed by almost 100 investors, said it would ‘reduce financial markets participants’ ability to meet their own mandatory reporting obligations’, including those under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR).”

The move is seen by many to be the product of intense lobbying efforts aimed at reducing the reporting burden under the CSRD. Basing climate reporting on a company’s own designation of materiality appears to be a compromise, as the president of the EC previously stated that the EC would attempt to reduce the reporting requirements present in EFRAG’s initial draft by 25%.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile