CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites


A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.


An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.


The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.


Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Since we are on the topic of the EU’s CSRD – its extra-jurisdictional scoping requirements require non-EU companies with a large enough presence in the EU to disclose under the framework. Materiality assessments must be conducted on a variety of ESG topics. The results of those assessments, along with detailed information on material issues, must be disclosed in the company’s report. As with just about any law, it brings a high litigation risk.

The obvious litigation risk stems from ensuring compliance with the law, but there is another less obvious risk. While disclosures will be made in line with EU law, the disclosures will be public, which means that they may create actionable litigation issues for investors and other jurisdictions’ regulatory bodies. For example, the SEC already scrutinizes voluntary ESG reports and can bring enforcement actions based on the statements therein. This means that the expansive disclosures under the CSRD can be subjected to the same scrutiny fro the SEC and potential enforcement actions may arise from improperly disclosed issues. A recent Skadden memo analyzes this risk stating:

“Any public disclosures required under the CSRD would be subject to the anti-fraud provisions of U.S. securities laws and potential scrutiny by U.S. investors looking for statements that could be the basis for a lawsuit. For example, a U.S.-listed company that publishes global, group-wide ESG information only on its website or in an ESG report — primarily to comply with the CSRD and without including the same information in the company’s SEC filings — may nevertheless face a U.S. investor lawsuit or SEC enforcement action based on that information. The risk could be heightened given the CSRD’s requirements for granular disclosures that go beyond current SEC requirements.”

The CSRD also uses a double materiality approach, while the US uses a financial materiality standard. This means that companies may find themselves having to explain to the SEC why an issue meets the double materiality threshold but not the financial materiality threshold. The CSRD is going to have major global impacts for ESG disclosure – companies should ensure that they’re considering the full implications of compliance. Our guidebook “How to Conduct an ESG Materiality Assessment” is available to members to help them with this.

If you aren’t already signed up, subscribe to our complimentary ESG blog here: for daily updates delivered right to you.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile