CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Last week, the administration acted on its plan to repeal the EPA’s endangerment finding for greenhouse gas emissions. The 2009 endangerment finding underpinned many EPA rules related to GHG emissions. This includes the emissions requirements for vehicles and power plants. A recent article from the World Resources Institute discusses the implications:

“The impact is sweeping. The endangerment finding underpinned regulations across multiple sectors, including emissions limits for consumer vehicles, commercial vehicles and heavy-duty trucks, standards for coal-fired and natural gas power plants, and federal sustainability requirements that shape government procurement and broader market behavior… In practical terms, without the endangerment finding, regulating greenhouse gas emissions is no longer a legal requirement. The science hasn’t changed, but the obligation to act on it has been removed.”

This repeal does not come as a surprise. It has been a long-standing goal of the administration. Additionally, major legal challenges to the rescission will emerge once the final rule is published. Early litigation challenging the flimsy science of the administration’s “climate working group” yielded promising results. This may indicate that rescinding the endangerment finding poses a greater legal challenge than the administration expects. We’ll be covering the fallout of the rescission and the inevitable litigation as it works its way through the court system. Early legal battles will largely center on whether the rescission can stand while legal challenges play out, or if the courts will issue a hold, leaving the endangerment finding in place pending the outcome of litigation.

Our members can learn more about carbon management policy here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information compiled without the use of AI.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile