CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

23 State Attorneys General sent a letter to Fitch, Moody’s, and S&P Global, airing various grievances related to the downgrading of fossil fuel companies’ credit ratings. They argue that the ratings agencies have unjustly and unlawfully used ESG criteria in their credit rating decisions. Additionally, they allege that since sustainability mandates have been slowed globally, fossil fuel companies should be upgraded back to their former status. The letter states:

“Based on the same flawed ‘energy transition’ and ‘increasing regulations’ ESG predictions, S&P claimed that fossil-fuel-producing states’ economies were only improving ‘for now,’ and projected that those states would face a more ‘prolonged economic recovery,’ lagging behind other states. The Ratings Agencies continue to use ESG factors to weigh down ratings for fossil-fuel-producing states and municipalities, even after the Ratings Agencies’ ESG-driven predictions have proven to be incorrect. These methodological departures and conflicts of interest harm state economies, tax revenues, and investments.”

The AGs allege that ratings agencies adopted undisclosed UN PRI pledges. They argue that this, in conjunction with the agencies’ ESG consulting arms, created conflicts of interest in violation of SEC rules. They are requesting that the ratings firms withdraw from ESG commitments. Along with the letter, the AGs provide a list of 27 interrogatories that ask about how firms consider ESG factors in their credit ratings. The AGs warn that if their demands are not met, they will bring state legal action or refer the credit agencies to federal regulators.

Our members can learn more about ESG litigation here.

Interested in a membership with access to the complete range of benefits and resources? Sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile