CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

As regular readers of the blog know, there is an ongoing push from the federal government to challenge state-level climate lawsuits. These lawsuits seek restitution from fossil fuel companies for state and local governments recovering from, or future-proofing for, climate disasters. Getting these cases dismissed is a priority for the administration, which recently brought a new case against Minnesota. In the Complaint, the federal government summarizes its arguments, stating:

“Federal law, not state law, exclusively governs regulation of global greenhouse gas emissions. State law is preempted in this area due to the “‘overriding need for a uniform rule of decision’ on matters influencing national energy and environmental policy” and the “basic interests of federalism” enshrined in our Constitution. Id. at 91–92 (cleaned up). Minnesota’s state-law claims are thus preempted, and its reactivated litigation in state court today is currently thwarting the United States’ exclusive authority to regulate interstate air pollution, administer federal law, and conduct foreign affairs.”

Thus far, the tactic of challenging these climate suits has paid mixed dividends. In most cases, the administration’s arguments have been rejected. However, some courts sided with the administration, ruling that the cases are preempted and dismissed them. With a Supreme Court opinion on the matter likely incoming this summer, some have wondered why the administration does not wait for a dispositive ruling. The answer likely lies in the desire for expediency. If the Supreme Court rules in the administration’s favor, then pending cases will be controlled by that opinion. In which case, lower courts will start dismissing these cases en masse. If a case is already filed and pending when that happens, then the process moves faster.

Our members can learn more about ESG litigation here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile