CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Last week, the Supreme Court released its oral argument schedule for October 2026. At the top of its docket is Suncor Energy v. Commissioners of Boulder County. This highly anticipated climate preemption case will decide the future of state-led climate tort suits. SCOTUSblog writes of the case:

“The Supreme Court will kick off its 2026-27 term with oral arguments in a lawsuit brought by a Colorado county seeking millions of dollars from oil and gas companies for their alleged role in exacerbating climate change. The calendar for the justices’ October argument session, released on Tuesday afternoon, indicates that Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) v. Commissioners of Boulder County will be the first case argued on Monday, Oct. 5 – the first Monday in October and the official start of the court’s new term.”

The main issue at play is preemption. Under the federalism model, state laws cannot contradict federal law. The question is whether tort law cases seeking damages against energy companies for their role in creating climate disasters contradict federal energy policy. The federal government has intervened on the side of Suncor, arguing that the city of Boulder cannot settle national policy questions. Boulder, on the other hand, argues that this is strictly a state issue. The city alleges that the actions of Suncor injured the city and its population and that the courts ought to redress this injury. A decision in favor of Suncor would massively expand the federal government’s preemption powers. If the ability to sue for damages is treated as a valid proxy for regulation and policymaking, then any number of industries could seek protection from tort suits under similar theories.

Our members can learn more about ESG litigation here.

If you’re not already a member, sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile