CCRcorp Sites  

The CCRcorp Network unlocks access to a world of insights, research, guides and information in a range of specialty areas.

Our Sites

TheCorporateCounsel

TheCorporateCounsel.net

A basis for research and practical guidance focusing on federal securities laws, compliance & corporate governance.

DealLawyers

DealLawyers.com

An educational service that provides practical guidance on legal issues involving public and private mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures, private equity – and much more.

CompensationStandards

CompensationStandards.com

The “one stop” resource for information about responsible executive compensation practices & disclosure.

Section16.net

Section16.net

Widely recognized as the premier online research platform providing practical guidance on issues involving Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all of its related rules.

PracticalESG

PracticalESG.com

Keeping you in-the-know on environmental, social and governance developments

Previously, I blogged on the SEC’s attempt to subpoena ISS. This subpoena seeks to compel the organization to disclose its clients over the last four years and their voting records. ISS battled these disclosures over the summer when the SEC attempted to use an administrative subpoena to obtain the information. This led the SEC to file for a judicial subpoena in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Now ISS is challenging the SEC subpoena. In its response brief, ISS argues a variety of theories:

“The SEC’s subpoena seeks millions of lines of data showing how over 1,000 institutional investors voted on every shareholder vote in ProxyExchange—including votes on hot-button economic, political, and social issues—over a nearly four-year period. Compelling disclosure of that data would severely burden the free speech and associational rights of both ISS and its clients…

even the limited evidence in the public record shows that the SEC’s inquiry is part and parcel of a retaliatory campaign against ISS’ exercise of its First Amendment-protected speech rights, rather than a good-faith investigation into ISS’ compliance with federal securities law. That alone is enough to deny the application. Further, the SEC’s request is overbroad and seeks irrelevant materials. ISS has complied or is in the process of complying with each and every SEC request except the SEC’s demand for data which would allow the SEC to match particular clients to particular votes. The SEC has not asserted even a plausible need for that discrete category of information”

ISS has had luck fighting anti-ESG in the state courts, seeing several laws enjoined on compelled speech grounds. We’ll see if similar First Amendment arguments work against the SEC.

Our members can learn more about anti-ESG here.

Interested in a membership with access to the complete range of benefits and resources? Sign up now and take advantage of our no-risk “100-Day Promise” – during the first 100 days as an activated member, you may cancel for any reason and receive a full refund. But it will probably pay for itself before then. Members also save hours of research and reading time each week by using our filtered and curated library of ESG/sustainability resources covering over 100 sustainability subject areas – updated daily with practical and credible information.

Practical Guidance for Companies, Curated for Clarity.

Back to all blogs

The Editor

Zachary Barlow is a licensed attorney. He earned his JD from the University of Mississippi and has a bachelor’s in Public Policy Leadership. He practiced law at a mid-size firm and handled a wide variety of cases. During this time he assisted in overseeing compliance of a public entity and litigated contract disputes, gaining experience both in and outside of the courtroom. Zachary currently assists the PracticalESG.com editorial team by providing research and creating content on a spectrum of ESG… View Profile